Volunteering at soup kitchens and painting schools is great, but that’s not how Martin Luther King, Jr. changed the world.

The United States declared Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s birthday a federal holiday in 1983. Since then, it has come to be celebrated as a “Day of Service,” which usually translates to volunteering in one’s community doing nice things like painting murals, picking up trash, or donating blood.
These are in themselves good things to do, but to associate MLK with volunteering is to misrepresent his life and his legacy.
Dr. King was not a volunteer. He wasn’t a kindly Santa Claus figure who wearily sighed, “Can’t we all just get along?”
He was a revolutionary who demanded structural change.
He did not just “have a dream.” He acted on his convictions, risking––and ultimately, losing––his life to challenge the status quo of injustice. He led marches and strikes and went to jail for breaking unfair laws.
And we have every reason to believe that, had he been allowed to live, he would have continued protesting racism, war, and economic exploitation.
So, what does it mean to “celebrate” MLK Day? What if, instead of volunteering, we read, listened, and reflected on his words and whether we have achieved the future he imagined? (For instance, how is it possible that some states celebrate segregationist leaders on the same day as Martin Luther King, Jr.?) What if we expected the country to live up to what Dr. King dreamed and demanded? And what if we took action to fix the ways in which it doesn’t?
Over the past five years, I’ve seen this interpretation of the holiday gain traction. This year, members of Dr. King’s family are calling on us to use MLK Day as a Day of Action for Voting Rights.
- We can do this by calling our senators and demanding that they eliminate the filibuster and pass the John R. Lewis Freedom to Vote Act. Dial 1-888-408-2349 to be connected with your senator.
(How is the filibuster related to voting rights? Learn more here and here. What’s in the Freedom To Vote Act? Learn more here.)

*About the title of this post: I thought of this after reflecting on how challenging injustice is not “nice” or “polite” behavior. Activism requires confronting injustice and making “good trouble” to challenge “the way things are.” Dr. King was willing to stand up for his beliefs. He angered and inconvenienced both people in power and incrementalists who agreed with him but believed we should “wait for things to get better in due time.” That is what I mean when I say he was not a nice guy. In the face of injustice, I don’t believe any of us should be “nice.”
Note: I adapted this post from a blog post I wrote on MLK Day in 2017.







